Slavery (on Thursdays)

[Esquilax]

I have never addressed your points esq in case you hadn't noticed. I have said that huggy has said everything there is to say. The respondent above is him. It's becoming clearer why you don't get it.

Oh no, I was being charitable.

In that case, you are an evasive jackass. Congrats.

I've already explained to you that I find Huggy's responses, as I've understood them, to be insufficient, where they aren't outright dishonest. That was the instigating factor in my asking you to explain what you found so compelling about them, since you apparently do. Your inability to articulate what's so great about them has been noted.

To recap, this is how the dialogue has gone so far:

My position is that I don't find Huggy's answers to be compelling or truthful in the least.

Your answer is that Huggy has already answered my points.

I then press you on this, seeking to figure out what it is that you found so effective about him crowing over the word "noun" while avoiding answering my question.

Your response is that Huggy has answered my questions.

If anyone isn't getting this, it's you. Why do you even come here, if you're so unwilling to engage in discussion?