RE: Why all "Logical Proofs Of God" fail ...
March 9, 2014 at 3:08 pm
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2014 at 3:15 pm by Mystic.)
(March 9, 2014 at 2:44 pm)Mr. Moncrieff Wrote:(March 9, 2014 at 2:40 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: That's not true. Show why that is the case.
Because you are otherwise predicating a very many of your considerations upon a notional supposition. It is a desultory exploration of truth and an arrogant proliferation of belief that allows for Man to impose such ideas upon another without expectation of challenge.
Why does everything have to be challenged? Why is not the believers cliche that's a matter of faith not respected?
When it comes to morals, we often try to impose our ideas upon others, but they often come to the end, back to feelings that are subjective and can't be proven objectively.
Should no one be allowed to state their moral beliefs as well? Or try to promote their moral beliefs as well?
Another thing to state, is that even if the believers were relying on analytical evidence. Why are they required to spoon feed it if they are to claim something based on what they researched?
You don't have to prove everything you assert.
