RE: Why all "Logical Proofs Of God" fail ...
March 9, 2014 at 3:19 pm
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2014 at 3:22 pm by Mystic.)
(March 9, 2014 at 3:15 pm)Mr. Moncrieff Wrote:(March 9, 2014 at 3:08 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: Why does everything have to be challenged? Why is not the believers cliche that's a matter of faith not respected?
When it comes to morals, we often try to impose our ideas upon others, but they often come to the end, back to feelings that are subjective and can't be proven objectively.
Should no one be allowed to state their moral beliefs as well? Or try to promote their moral beliefs as well?
You and I both know that is hugely dependent upon the nature of that promotion.
Religion hasn't been the most reserved in this regard.
So it's not a universal. If I believe faith in God is similar to faith in morality or justice, why do I have to demonstrate that analytically and not be allowed to simply assert what I personally believe?
The claim that it's not similar to faith in morality or justice would require the same proof claim from my standpoint if I am required to prove it.
