(March 11, 2014 at 7:53 am)Esquilax Wrote:(March 11, 2014 at 7:33 am)Jacob(smooth) Wrote: From where I sit, it looks thus. For it to be considered accurate it must be without error. I'm not representing that it isn't true in any particular, merely that it's not true in all.
So if you like, I can offer you say 5 of the reasons I stopped believing the bible was inerrant, (accurate in this case) and you can refute them?
Everyone ready for forty more pages of tedious clarifications?!
Heh, I said this (http://atheistforums.org/thread-24451-po...#pid617118) on page 4. Doesn't seem to have really gone anywhere since then.