Creatures performing similar roles within an eco-system evolve similar solutions to the problems, sometimes....
Whilst one can point to the Tasmanian Tiger and the Wolf to see similar forms from very different beginnings there are also marked differences - particularly in the dentition, breeding, jaw design, behaviour.....
In other words you are interpreting similarities based on being human. No wolf would mistake a Tasmanian Tiger for another wolf. Its a largely superficial similarity based on body shape and head shape.
We might, of course, if we are expecting guidance, expect to see more similarities that we do. There's nothing today that resembles a T-Rex - even a small one nor is there anything that resembles the pterasaur, the giant carniverous pigs of north america and so on.
What we have is a mix of unique solutions and solutions that recur throughout the evolution of animals. I can't see why this would show guidance. If it did - what was the aim of the guidance? It certainly hasn't hurried evolution along (bearing in mind life is around 4 billion years old and multicellular life didn't appear for 3.5 billion years).
Nor has this guidance improved the survival ratios of species. As it stands (depending on who you ask) between 98 and 99.8% of all the creatures that have ever lived have gone extinct. If that is the result of guidance then the whole thing is being guided by a cretin.
To be honest what I think you are doing here is seeing evidence that supports your theory, whilst, ignoring the mass of evidence against it. Just my point of view, of course YMMV.
Whilst one can point to the Tasmanian Tiger and the Wolf to see similar forms from very different beginnings there are also marked differences - particularly in the dentition, breeding, jaw design, behaviour.....
In other words you are interpreting similarities based on being human. No wolf would mistake a Tasmanian Tiger for another wolf. Its a largely superficial similarity based on body shape and head shape.
We might, of course, if we are expecting guidance, expect to see more similarities that we do. There's nothing today that resembles a T-Rex - even a small one nor is there anything that resembles the pterasaur, the giant carniverous pigs of north america and so on.
What we have is a mix of unique solutions and solutions that recur throughout the evolution of animals. I can't see why this would show guidance. If it did - what was the aim of the guidance? It certainly hasn't hurried evolution along (bearing in mind life is around 4 billion years old and multicellular life didn't appear for 3.5 billion years).
Nor has this guidance improved the survival ratios of species. As it stands (depending on who you ask) between 98 and 99.8% of all the creatures that have ever lived have gone extinct. If that is the result of guidance then the whole thing is being guided by a cretin.
To be honest what I think you are doing here is seeing evidence that supports your theory, whilst, ignoring the mass of evidence against it. Just my point of view, of course YMMV.
Kuusi palaa, ja on viimeinen kerta kun annan vaimoni laittaa jouluvalot!
