Richard Dawkin's big blunder

[Heywood]

If there are similarities to isolated cases, it's likely that some things just objectively work better than others. It doesn't prove supernatural design. It just proves the efficiency of some solutions.

I have not claimed it proves supernatural design. However since evolution is guided by the fitness paradigm, an intellect can use it as a creative process to produce specific forms. Human beings or any other intellects that might exist can use evolution as a creative tool because it isn't a blind process as suggested by Dawkins. Design the fitness paradigm and evolution will produce an intended product.