Richard Dawkin's big blunder

[Alex K]

If you could generate the complexity we observe and attribute to natural selection with a completely random fitness paradigm, I would consider my speculation falsified.

So after all your posturing, all your little speeches, you're nothing but a common cdesign proponentsist. You think evolution without intelligent design is wrong, but the argument you instead make here is that Dawkins says something you don't like in some TV series? Please, science is not done on TV shows, forget the TV and argue what you really want to argue.