Richard Dawkin's big blunder

[Heywood]

So after all your posturing, all your little speeches, you're nothing but a common cdesign proponentsist. You think evolution without intelligent design is wrong, but the argument you instead make here is that Dawkins says something you don't like in some TV series? Please, science is not done on TV shows, forget the TV and argue what you really want to argue.

I am arguing what I want to argue.

Evolution is guided and not blind. Evolution can be used by intellects to create specific things.

I substantiated my argument by calling out Dawkins for saying something which I think is wrong(he said evolution was completely blind).