RE: Richard Dawkin's big blunder
March 14, 2014 at 11:33 am
(This post was last modified: March 14, 2014 at 11:34 am by Faith No More.)
(March 14, 2014 at 11:29 am)Heywood Wrote: I substantiated my argument by calling out Dawkins for saying something which I think is wrong(he said evolution was completely blind).
The only way to substantiate your argument is to create a false dichotomy between an intentional agent or completely random processes that do not follow any rules.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell