(March 14, 2014 at 11:36 am)Alex K Wrote: You substantiated the fact that you seem to mean something different from him by blindness of evolution, nothing more.
I addressed this concern but you ignored it. It seems that blindness, in Dawkins eyes, means not guided by anything. Hence he called his own accurate demonstration of how evolution works....a bit of a cheat...because it was guided by a fitness function.
Is natural evolution a bit of a cheat too because it is guided by a fitness function?