RE: Richard Dawkin's big blunder
March 14, 2014 at 11:46 am
(This post was last modified: March 14, 2014 at 11:48 am by Alex K.)
(March 14, 2014 at 11:41 am)Heywood Wrote: Is natural evolution a bit of a cheat too because it is guided by a fitness function?
No, you have it ass-backwards again. Whatever guides the selection process in nature is what you have to use as your "fitness function" in the theory in order to describe nature.
(March 14, 2014 at 11:41 am)Heywood Wrote:(March 14, 2014 at 11:36 am)Alex K Wrote: You substantiated the fact that you seem to mean something different from him by blindness of evolution, nothing more.
I addressed this concern but you ignored it. It seems that blindness, in Dawkins eyes, means not guided by anything.
No I'm pretty sure that's not what Dawkins means by blindness. You just made that up.