RE: Richard Dawkin's big blunder
March 14, 2014 at 11:57 am
(This post was last modified: March 14, 2014 at 11:57 am by Alex K.)
(March 14, 2014 at 11:55 am)Heywood Wrote: Evolution, as a means of creation, is set it and forget it. It isn't guided by God on a constant basis. If that is what you are implying I said, your making a straw man argument.
What DID you imply, if you argue that evolution needs guidance by an intelligence to work, but you don't mean God? Do you want to argue that one can set the initial conditions such that the outcome is exactly what is desired by your deity?
