Richard Dawkin's big blunder

[max-greece]

To say that evolution in no way contradicts any religious tenets is false; it seems to me that evolution threw the book of genesis into the fucking grinder.

I said evolution is not inconsistent with a theistic world view. I never said it did not contradict any religious tenets.

---

Moving the goalposts much? We were talking about targets and now we are talking about potential targets. Anything and everything can be a potential target.

This would be true is evolution were truly blind. However since evolution is guided not everything can be realized.

I will have one more go at this to see how honest you are being in your inability to see how ridiculous you are being.



This pig-like creature lived in India about 55 million years ago. It was about the size of a domestic cat.

What did it become?

If you know that's fine - but are you really claiming its off-spring were potentially predictable? A potential target? Guided design?

What designer - if aiming for the target state of today's creatures (its offspring) would start from here?