(March 15, 2014 at 4:22 pm)Heywood Wrote:(March 15, 2014 at 1:35 am)Esquilax Wrote: What would "evolution without a target," even look like, to you?
Unguided evolution would be descent with change. There would be no cumulative selection. It would look like the random sentence generator in Dawkins' example.
What is 'cumulative selection'? Do you mean cumulative change?
What happens to the changes from on generation to another? Do they just disappear?
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.