RE: Richard Dawkin's big blunder
March 17, 2014 at 9:27 am
(This post was last modified: March 17, 2014 at 9:28 am by Mudhammam.)
(March 17, 2014 at 7:08 am)max-greece Wrote:Quote:Heywood seems to be arguing that the hole in the ground was designed for the puddle so that the water would fit perfectly onto it.
Great analogy - I am stealing it for sure!
Ditto.
But really he's saying, "No, no, not the puddle.. I'm here! And I'm asking a question so it must mean I'm made of some special stuff... that could only come about by even more special means than anything else in nature!"
And that's pretty much what evolution explains...if he had bothered to try to understand it.