RE: Richard Dawkin's big blunder
March 22, 2014 at 4:18 pm
(This post was last modified: March 22, 2014 at 4:33 pm by Heywood.)
(March 22, 2014 at 4:04 pm)Esquilax Wrote: Okay, let's recap what just happened here. I gave a very clear, unambiguous reason why Heywood's analogy failed. With all the smug confidence of an imbecile, Heywood's response was to restate his flawed premise, and that's it.- bolded by me
I'm sorry Esquilax since you have stooped to name calling, I no longer feel obligated to respond to any of your posts. I'm not saying I am ignoring you....it's just that I don't see much point in carrying on a conversation with you if your inclination is to verbally abuse your adversary.
I will of course respect your position as a moderator and will fill obligated to respond when you post something in accordance with your position.
(March 22, 2014 at 2:58 pm)Rampant.A.I. Wrote: False dilemma with god of the gaps. It's logically possible life on earth was created and guided by aliens, but not logically probable. Furthermore, if you're talking about an alien who found earth and genetically enhanced some of the primates, you're no longer in the Christian canon.
I don't argue the Christian canon.
(March 22, 2014 at 4:11 pm)Esquilax Wrote:(March 22, 2014 at 4:08 pm)Heywood Wrote: Well I disagree with you.
How do you know that one fitness function(your claim not mine) is not designed?
Ah, the standard tactic of the christian with a worthless argument!
"You can't prove it's not true!"
Negative Esquilax.
He made a claim, I am asking him to substantiate it.
