(April 3, 2014 at 1:01 pm)ThePinsir Wrote: If an idea or theory has really good, elegant math to support it, everything makes perfect sense and lines up logically, but can't be tested, is it still "science"?
I read an article yesterday about inflation/multiverse ideas. Since we can't test it, at least yet, even though it's not "woo", is it technically pseudo-science? Can it be taken seriously?
In addition to what Mister Agenda had to say...
It is not mature science - not to the point of being award the pedigree of a scientific theory.
M-theory falls under the purview of theoretical physics - where "theory" means something quite a bit different than "scientific theory".
I wouldn't consider it pseudo-science - rather an interesting, currently untestable hypothesis. Absent the coherent mathematics behind it, I'd call it woo / pseudo-science.