(April 3, 2014 at 4:19 pm)Tobie Wrote: If it's un-testable then I wouldn't call it an hypothesis, since it's beginning to get into the realm of Russell's teapot. A theory would need some way of testing it, and preferably a set of expected results that can be tested against.
Would this also apply to the widely-believed Star-Gas-Star model? We obviously can't test the origin or stars, and I don't think we've ever observed a star being born (have we?). Same with the origin of planets - it would take probably a billion or so years to watch space debris coalesce under its own gravity to form planets; we can't very well perform controlled laboratory experiments on it either.
So is our current model of the formation of solar systems also "not even a hypothesis"? I am so confused
I'm a bitch, I'm a lover
I'm a goddess, I'm a mother
I'm a sinner, I'm a saint
I do not feel ashamed
I'm a goddess, I'm a mother
I'm a sinner, I'm a saint
I do not feel ashamed