I've always been troubled by the somewhat cavalier attitude of the Supreme Court towards pornography. Perhaps best summarized by Justice Potter Stewart's quote: "I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description [hard-core pornography]; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that. "
This is an ex post facto determination and the law should be able to define what it is against.
This is an ex post facto determination and the law should be able to define what it is against.
