|
Hume's Guillotine sets up an ethical regress problem
|
 RE: Hume's Guillotine sets up an ethical regress problem
April 12, 2014 at 9:56 pm
(This post was last modified: April 12, 2014 at 9:57 pm by Coffee Jesus.)
(April 12, 2014 at 9:42 pm)MindForgedManacle Wrote: Value is by definition subjective, and could never be otherwise. I disagree. I think evaluative statements often express qualia—such as the pain of being burned or the pleasure of intercourse—just like the word "bright" can be used to express a quale. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Hume's Guillotine sets up an ethical regress problem - by Coffee Jesus - April 12, 2014 at 9:14 pm
RE: Hume's Guillotine sets up an ethical regress problem - by MindForgedManacle - April 12, 2014 at 9:29 pm
RE: Hume's Guillotine sets up an ethical regress problem - by Coffee Jesus - April 12, 2014 at 9:32 pm
RE: Hume's Guillotine sets up an ethical regress problem - by MindForgedManacle - April 12, 2014 at 9:42 pm
RE: Hume's Guillotine sets up an ethical regress problem - by Coffee Jesus - April 12, 2014 at 9:56 pm
RE: Hume's Guillotine sets up an ethical regress problem - by MindForgedManacle - April 12, 2014 at 10:04 pm
RE: Hume's Guillotine sets up an ethical regress problem - by Coffee Jesus - April 12, 2014 at 11:03 pm
RE: Hume's Guillotine sets up an ethical regress problem - by Jackalope - April 13, 2014 at 3:01 am
RE: Hume's Guillotine sets up an ethical regress problem - by Coffee Jesus - April 13, 2014 at 9:14 am
|
