RE: "Gödel's ontological proof" proves existence of God
April 16, 2014 at 4:21 pm
(This post was last modified: April 16, 2014 at 4:23 pm by Chas.)
(April 16, 2014 at 1:59 pm)Coffee Jesus Wrote:(April 16, 2014 at 1:45 pm)Chas Wrote: Please give me evidence of the effects. I'll wait ...
You just shifted the burden. You were claiming there aren't any gods, and I didn't accept your conclusion.
We have virtually no reasons to think there is any god. That there definitely isn't any god only follows if your definition is very stringent.
There was no shift there. I said we observe no effects. If you disagree, show the effects.
This is no different than "I observe no evidence of unicorns. If you think there are unicorns, show me some evidence."
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
