RE: Benghazi: What's the Charge Again?
May 2, 2014 at 4:29 pm
(This post was last modified: May 2, 2014 at 4:36 pm by Mudhammam.)
(May 2, 2014 at 4:25 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote:(May 2, 2014 at 4:17 pm)Pickup_shonuff Wrote: The legitimate scandal of Benghazi is that the Obama administration appears to have purposely misled the American people about what transpired, to protect the President's foreign policy rep, just two months away from an Presidential election.
How would such a lie help?
Embassies get attacked by terrorists all the time. It happened 13 times under Bush, which Al Qaida was "on the run". Why would it be especially damning to have one happen under Obama? And why does a riot make it any better? An attack is an attack. Dead is dead. The damage is done either way, whether the attack was planned or spontaneous.
Actually whether or not the attack was the result of a stupid YouTube video or a response to a CIA blacksite that was responsible for kidnapping and torturing local "terrorist suspects," that makes a big difference.
It also stinks to high heaven that CIA director David Petraeous was forced to resign days after the election over an affair, and a month prior his mistress accidentally admitted this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PgsLSsSKMI