(May 2, 2014 at 4:29 pm)Pickup_shonuff Wrote: Actually whether or not the attack was the result of a stupid YouTube video or a response to a CIA blacksite that was responsible for kidnapping and torturing local "terrorist suspects," that makes a big difference.
Interesting. So the GOP is outraged over a cover up regarding a CIA blacksite where terror suspects were tortured? Is the GOP against torture now or what? Sorry, I don't mean to be difficult but I'm really trying to understand the outrage.
So, if Obama HAD said it was an Al Qaida attack on day one, it would have come out that the attack was against a CIA blacksite? And that's why he had to lie? Or would it have been damaging to the Obama administration in other ways?
Again, not being difficult. I'm really trying to understand. I need more mapping.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
