(May 3, 2014 at 12:33 am)Heywood Wrote: The lie was sending Rice out to spin this as a spontaneous act of an angry mob. The evidence this is a lie is the fact that there was no evidence this was a spontaneous act of an angry mob and lots of evidence this was a pre-planed attack.
That's pretty weak. Can you provide any evidence that Rice was directed to spin the attack as an act by a mob in a conspiracy to mislead the public? It needs to be strong evidence since you can't even think of a motive, even by conjecture.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist