RE: Benghazi: What's the Charge Again?
May 4, 2014 at 7:39 pm
(This post was last modified: May 4, 2014 at 7:40 pm by DeistPaladin.)
(May 4, 2014 at 7:29 pm)Heywood Wrote: When you have to resort to insults.....its another sign that you've lost an argument.
Wrong. It's perfectly acceptable to call out an opponent for lying, being hypocritical or other insults directly related to the arguments presented. The ad hominem is an insult used in place of an argument, not in addition to the argument itself.
You have never presented any strong evidence that there was an intent to deceive and the GOP's sanctimonious claims that any lies are intolerable are clearly pretexts for a political agenda. Even if you personally agree that W should have been impeached, you are still supporting the hypocrisy and not calling it out for what it is. As one concerned with honesty, you should do so.
Quote:One difference between you and me DP....is you are a lockstepper who buys into left leaning hate peddling. We got-em on the right too. You've been brainwashed and you don't even know it.Was that a personal insult you just resorted to?
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
