RE: Benghazi: What's the Charge Again?
May 6, 2014 at 6:49 pm
(This post was last modified: May 6, 2014 at 6:55 pm by DeistPaladin.)
(May 6, 2014 at 6:31 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Isn’t it funny how this administration works?Perfect. So now is the outrage because we haven't found those responsible?
R: Whoa! What happened? How could this happen? Why did you say it was this when it was really that?
D: We will do an investigation and get to the bottom of it, I assure you that people will be held accountable.
R: Ok…so what did you find out?
D: I told you….we are investigating and I am not about to comment on an open investigation…
R: Umm….ok…I guess I will wait….
D: Good.
R: So it’s been a year, did you get to the bottom of it?
D: Dude, why are you still bringing this up? That was an entire year ago!? You racist.
R: Huh?
Do you see how the allegations move around based on the moment? Why don't you and the rest of the GOP make up your minds what the accusation is exactly and then we can respond?
Was it because of the supposed lie about the nature of the attack?
Or was it because we haven't found those responsible?
Or was it because we didn't see it coming or provide enough security?
Or is it because nothing was done in time to save the ambassador?
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist