Benghazi: What's the Charge Again?

[Statler Waldorf]

Tsk tsk. This is dishonest. You removed the context (why the UN might have an anti-American bias) to change the topic to why terrorists attacked us. This is called quote mining. Additionally, you glossed over the "like" part of the sentence, which indicates this invasion was an example.

Backpedal all you like, your assertion was absurd and you know it.

First of all, the entire Iraq War was a war crime.

Because?

You can't just invade a country because you want to. That's called a crime of aggression.

According to whom? Which international law are you referring to?

Second, the incidents of torture at Abu Garab are examples of crimes against humanity.

According to whom? Which international law are you referring to? Please back this up with at least something!

We have also illegally detained suspects without trial, some of whom might be terrorists and some of who might have been turned in by bounty hunters but are in reality just people who were in the wrong place at the wrong time. We have no idea because we won't bring them to trial.

Again, which law are you referring to? Back it up with something. Your assertions are meaningless.

Conspiracy theory? These are documented facts.

This ought to be good.

We DID invade Iraq.

Yup, but you have yet to demonstrate which international law that violates.

We DO have documented lies that were told prior to the invasion.

Such as? Remember for something to be a lie the person must know it is a falsehood at the time. Good luck.

There is no conspiracy theory. There is history.

Another meaningless assertion.

The allegations against Obama over Benghazi haven't even been articulated clearly (the reason for the OP) never mind proven.

Where did the narrative that that attack in Benghazi was a response to a YouTube video come from?

Perfect. So now is the outrage because we haven't found those responsible?

Well that is ridiculous yes, but that is not what I was referring to. I was referring to the tactics of this administration regarding investigations.

Do you see how the allegations move around based on the moment? Why don't you and the rest of the GOP make up your minds what the accusation is exactly and then we can respond?

Is there some rule against multiple accusations?

“Wait, now you are saying that OJ Simpson murdered Nicole Brown Simpson? I thought you just said that he murdered Ron Goldman? Get your story straight sheesh!”

Was it because of the supposed lie about the nature of the attack?

Yes.

Or was it because we haven't found those responsible?

And, not or.

Or was it because we didn't see it coming or provide enough security?

And, not or.

Or is it because nothing was done in time to save the ambassador?

And, not or. All of the above.

The topic is Benghazi, not Baghdad, Daddyo....at your age, with your poor eyesight and with your deteriorating mental capabilities, maybe you were confused by the spelling between the two. All those drugs back in your hippie days turned your brain to Silly Putty.

This is awesome. He loves it when you poke fun at the fact that he’s 91. Nice job keeping them on point though, whenever their guy is in trouble they’ll always divert back to attacking Bush; it’s some kind of subconscious fascination with him.