RE: Benghazi: What's the Charge Again?
May 7, 2014 at 11:09 pm
(This post was last modified: May 7, 2014 at 11:13 pm by Heywood.)
(May 7, 2014 at 10:20 pm)Ryantology (╯°◊°)╯︵ ══╬ Wrote: We had a moral obligation not to put the fucker in power and prop up his regime in the first place. Seems like we are awfully choosy about which moral obligations we care about.
Negative Ryantology....if you were paying full attention you would have seen that in this thread I have already expressed my disdain for our past support of Hussien and listed that fact as why we had a moral obligation to remove him even if it meant shedding some of our own blood.
(May 7, 2014 at 10:20 pm)Ryantology (╯°◊°)╯︵ ══╬ Wrote:Quote:B)An endless quasi-war and endless sanctions against the Iraqi people needed to stop.
Could have done that by simply walking away from the whole mess and letting it sort itself out, which was exactly what ended up happening anyway, if you ignore the few hundred thousand dead Iraqis and the few thousand dead American servicepersons.
After screwing the Iraqi people over by supporting Hussein, we had an obligation to at least give them a chance for peace and freedom. You would have us just walk away without any attempt to remedy the situation....which is reprehensible.