debunking UFO theories

[CharnelRC]

Broad generalizations aside, I'd say there's your problem: if you won't read the rules then you kind of give up your legitimacy where complaints about them are concerned.

Don't mind the rule, but approach. Ofc every forum has a rule against spamming, but we could also use human judgement before deciding what's spam and what's not.

I didn't post for advertising, if I did I wouldn't waste my time debating here. I'm interested in debunking nuts like these UFO clowns who claim Phobos on Sol613 images is a UFO. Funny thing is that great majority of youtubers easily believe these nuts. If only they were presented with facts in a simple and appealing way. I think those clowns would soon have to retire back to circuses.

It doesn't take a genius to realize how fake and unfounded all their theories are. Of course, most people are not astrophysicists to understand these facts by themselves and in result easily accept the flying object to be UFO over Phobos. Most of these people however, despite being so easily tricked, are intelligent individuals who will gladly accept facts if they are presented to them in a way they can understand.

Take the "fake moon landing" arguments for example, like a "waving flag". Every astrophysicist knows it's caused by a secondary motion under the law of inertia. This however means nothing to a psychologist or a lawyer, so they'll usually tell you that you're full of @#$%. So I was thinking for some time about simplifying these terms and facts in such a way that a non-astrophysicist can clearly understand. Sometimes it seems quite impossible to do, but I'm more optimistic.

So anyway, thanks for replying. Most moderators wouldn't give a damn.