RE: Rape
May 26, 2014 at 5:16 am
(This post was last modified: May 26, 2014 at 5:17 am by BlackMason.)
(May 25, 2014 at 3:37 pm)Bad Wolf Wrote:(May 25, 2014 at 2:34 pm)BlackMason Wrote: I use wikipedia a lot myself and disagree with people that say wikipedia sucks. My mentioning of wiki here was to show that Wolf also didn't refer to PEER REVIEWED articles.
I referenced Wikipedia twice, for the terms 'no true scotsman' and 'Poe's law'. Hardly the same as making a claim is it? But you've already been put to bed on that one by everyone else.
Actually you're wrong you bitch maggot! You said a scotsman fallacy was not made. That IS a claim and the burden of proof is then on you to prove why it was not. You referenced the wiki page. Then I took you step by step and explained to you why it actually was. Then I told you that your understanding of the concept is too rigid. This is because you don't understand the actual principle behind the fallacy. This renders you incapable to see it being made in less obvious circumstances. Capisce?
(May 25, 2014 at 3:37 pm)Bad Wolf Wrote:(May 25, 2014 at 2:34 pm)BlackMason Wrote: Also wiki makes use of sources that are NOT peer review material themselves. You get magazine references of all sorts there too. I love wiki but here I'm just demonstrating Wolf's facepalm worthy comment.
You are demonstrably, a fucking idiot.
That would be my mistake. I was meant to communicate that not all wiki sources are of the peer review type.
8000 years before Jesus, the Egyptian god Horus said, "I am the way, the truth, the life."