(April 29, 2010 at 9:13 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote: Age lines??? Really Sae!!!
Yes really. And quite relevant to one's lifetime (assuming they live within common current human society). By "age line", I mean to refer to age as a discriminatory point on which a thing can be decided (in example, this wine is aged 50 years: it can be sold. This wine has aged 49: it cannot). For humans within our current societies a similar process takes place.
For example: In the united states, it is common for a human to be designated as an adult after having aged 18 years. In contrast... female humans in Iran are designated as having crossed this "age line" at half that (9 years). Still others (such as Egypt) set this line to 21 years. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_majority
To my knowledge... I am the only person who harshly criticizes age lines
Quote:IF one's identity shnges over one's lifetime then one NEVER had an identity to start with
my2c
Why would that be? Let us say I have a cup full of water. By the laws of logic: this must be a cup full of water. This is it's identity.
Say now that I create a fracture in the glass, and half of the water pours out. It is now a fractured cup half full of water. "It"'s identity has changed... but has it changed so greatly that we should stop thinking of it as the same cup?
This last question is of incredible philosophical importance... and it has applications in every field to which you might name... especially in psychology... where there arise such very practical questions as "after 40 years in prison... has this person indeed changed enough to the point that the reason they were put in jail in the first place is no longer sound?"
To illustrate how I mean this in another way. Say you have a simple circle, which we will call "A". Now advance in time a little and distort that circle a bit. When you compare this 'new' circle to A, it is almost imperceptibly different, perhaps to the point one might question how it is indeed not "A" at all. Then go with this new circle, distort it a bit, and compare once again to A. It is now perhaps somewhat noticeably different... but overall you see it as A and after not a second of consideration you declare it to be A. Now, continue the aforementioned process repeatedly some number of times... and compare it to A again. Say that it has changed to the point where there are a number of distinct differences between it and A... and rather hesitantly you call it A. Repeat this process another good few times... and compare it to A again. Say it has changed so significantly from A by now, that it is rather a stretch to still refer to it as A... so that one might after a long while of uncertainty call it "A...?". Finally... continue the process from there... and you will eventually get to the point where even remotely considering it "A" could well be considered insanity by any definition.
Lots of intriguing things about this... I worry that it is beyond base college level though... :S
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
