RE: Christianity IS Geocentrism.
May 28, 2014 at 2:57 pm
(This post was last modified: May 28, 2014 at 3:12 pm by Ksa.)
(May 28, 2014 at 2:32 pm)Godschild Wrote:(May 28, 2014 at 9:48 am)Ksa Wrote: If the angels were superior, then why did God bother creating Adam and Eve that are, according to you, inferior beings, after he created the angels. Did God get dumber and could no longer do better? Unless, he created superior beings! If the angels were superior, why not stick to making angels?
In case you got a nut missing I'll give you an analogy: Honda makes the 2014 model, imagine, in 2018, honda takes the 2004 model and labels it as the 2018 model. Will anyone buy it? It is you who are the pretender.
The scriptures says nothing about humans be inferior, it says we are below the angels in rank and scripture says that one day we will place above the angels. Good luck with that 2004 engine.
GC
Yes, but God told Jeremiah that, before he entered his mothers womb, he knew him, and appointed him prophet of the nations. Answer my question: When Jeremiah was 3 years old, was he a prophet yes or no? Yes!!! Yes!!! If God appointed Jeremiah as the prophet of the nations, it means that Jeremiah is the prophet of the fucking nations, whether he's 3 years old or 3 days old. Who are you to question God?
If God appoints us to be superior to the angels, we are superior to the angels. Saying we are lower than the angels just because we are not yet of age is like saying that Jeremiah is not the prophet because he's 3 years old and, what good can come out of a 3 year old's mouth anyways? It's going against God! God says the child is the prophet, then, you listen to the child and obey him also! Even if you know mathematics and he doesn't! By no means you can be superior to him just because you are older or more knowledgeable!
God says Jeremiah is the prophet, Jeremiah is the prophet. God appoints us to be higher than the angels, then so be it. What's the problem? Again, I do not agree with your interpretation of the verses but just for the sake of the argument.