(May 29, 2014 at 4:44 pm)Heywood Wrote:If that is what you got from reading that article you either have serious reading comprehension issues or just saw what you wanted to see. The later is called conformation bias and you have it bad. That's not surprising given the content of many of your other posts on this board.(May 29, 2014 at 4:09 pm)popeyespappy Wrote: Doing it in a lab is a far cry from making it a viable energy source.
Did you check the skeptical science link?
I did, they took 12,000 papers from climate change researchers and from that cherry picked 4000 papers that dealt with human caused climate change to come up with the 97% figure.
If we cherry picked papers about the non human caused climate change we would come up with a different consensus figure.
I have a 900 foot driveway. I am thinking of paving part of it. If I do the black asphalt will absorb more heat then the gravel that is there now. Since less heat is reflected, my asphalting the driveway will contribute to climate change. Is it going to be enough to lead us to a catastrophe? I doubt it. Is the totality of human endeavors going to be enough to lead us to catastrophe? That's really the question and this survey doesn't give me any information whatsoever that allows me to answer that question.
It makes a good talking point for someone pushing an agenda on the non-thinking but other than that its useless piece of information.
Save a life. Adopt a greyhound.
![[Image: JUkLw58.gif]](https://i.imgur.com/JUkLw58.gif)