New Athiest Needs Help

[ThomM]

Again, shifting the burden of proof won't work on... thinking beings. Do you have to disprove every claim I make or else believe it?


That's a pretty big if that you haven't even attempted to demonstrate, and even if you could that doesn't necessarily mean that god gets to make all the rules.


Given that I don't believe he exists, I don't really want him to do anything. This is a non-sequitur anyway, probably added in to try and distract from the unjustified presuppositions you're using here, and your inability to provide evidence for the things you believe.


Things that haven't been demonstrated to exist can't do anything, so it'd be very silly of me to want anything from him. Enough dodging though: do you understand the burden of proof or not?

LOL! I love how you and the others breakout the exacto knife when you are backed into a corner! Sorta like a rain dance for lame answers!

Your roper-dope only works on dopes Moham&egger!

Backed into What corner - ?

So far - humans have named far more than 100,000 so called "gods".
And they have created far more religions about those gods - there are over 40,000 different version of xtianity in the USA alone.

And gods have actually existed - and they can be proven to have existed (As defined by their religions) - we actually have the physical remains of LOTS of these gods. Many of these long predate xtianity.

Using physical things like the existence of the Universe - to claim a god is real - fails to connect the dots to ANY particular religion - or even any particular group of them - even if it were evidence to begin with.

When you claim your god exists - YOUR words are only as good as the PROOF you offer to support your statement.
And if you cannot support your statement - we do not have to refute it - we can simply reject it as UNFOUNDED