RE: Lois Lerner's emails.
June 17, 2014 at 9:33 am
(This post was last modified: June 17, 2014 at 9:38 am by Heywood.)
(June 17, 2014 at 6:42 am)Brakeman Wrote:(June 16, 2014 at 10:34 pm)Brakeman Wrote: You are one special kind of stupid f*ck aren't you?
I have called you a bare faced liar because you claimed that there was, and I quote, "a legitimate line of investigation that points to him (Obama)."
That is a huge bare assed lie and you know it!
Quit trying to dodge your lie and address it. Either apologize for lying or cough up the evidence!
Heywood,
In case you missed it, I called you a liar... you might want to address that..
But I guess that people who lie about actually contacting god learn to live comfortably with their deceit.
It is an established fact that conservative groups were scrutinized at a greater rate than liberal progressive ones. Now I would be perfectly content with chalking this up to some douchbag, rouge, democunt IRS drones. In all honesty...who couldn't see a Minimalist like whackjob holding up the applications of conservative groups?
We shouldn't tolerate democunt abuse at the IRS or republocunt abuse in NJ (i.e. the bridge hoo-ha). It deserves to be investigated and it was. Now in the course of that investigation it is learned that certain emails were "accidently" destroyed; emails to and from people outside the IRS. This suggests that maybe people outside the IRS were involved....possibly even the administration.
(June 17, 2014 at 1:02 am)Pickup_shonuff Wrote: What would it take for the committed 'anti-anything-Republican' Democrats to link Obama to a legitimate scandal or criminal offense? Who cares if politics is fueling the investigation. Don't you want to know the truth of the matter, even if you have to wade through the silly smears to get there?
For some 'anti-anything-republicans' democrats....they simply do not care if the government is corrupt....as long as the corruption furthers their own ideology.
I argued with a friend tonight who is such a democrat and he basically admitted that he thought Tea Party groups should be given greater scrutiny then progressive ones. His attitude, "what ever it takes" to keep those republicans from destroying the country.