@Rhythm
-Whoa! Reign that in. That's a huge negatory right there. That's not how we explain mental disorders -at all-. I think you'd have to rule out a conjunction between mars and venus before you even considered that gem.
The conjunction between Mars and Venus is that they're both deities that originated from ancient Rome. And I did not say that mental disorders are caused only by productive incest relationship, I apologize if I was unclear on that.
Some of that is probably just an issue of translation between you and I - but the last bit, the hard numbers. Source this so we can talk about the same thing for sure?
My biology textbook - that dates around 2009. The publisher does not have a web site and the textbook is not translated to English, unfortunately. The numbers themselves are not accurate because they change every year as a result of yet more genetic diversity added to the pool.
50% as relative to whom...and a source?
Again, my biology textbook.
I want to reiterate here that my position - as accurately as I can express it - is that I don't care if brothers and sisters decided to screw like rabbits. 1st generation incest risk is a blip in the radar smaller than any measurement error. It takes many generations for it to overcome that first, minor step.
Alright. The way you express yourself sounds as if you're a bit frustrated, but I do think that your position is reasonable.
-Whoa! Reign that in. That's a huge negatory right there. That's not how we explain mental disorders -at all-. I think you'd have to rule out a conjunction between mars and venus before you even considered that gem.
The conjunction between Mars and Venus is that they're both deities that originated from ancient Rome. And I did not say that mental disorders are caused only by productive incest relationship, I apologize if I was unclear on that.
Some of that is probably just an issue of translation between you and I - but the last bit, the hard numbers. Source this so we can talk about the same thing for sure?
My biology textbook - that dates around 2009. The publisher does not have a web site and the textbook is not translated to English, unfortunately. The numbers themselves are not accurate because they change every year as a result of yet more genetic diversity added to the pool.
50% as relative to whom...and a source?
Again, my biology textbook.
I want to reiterate here that my position - as accurately as I can express it - is that I don't care if brothers and sisters decided to screw like rabbits. 1st generation incest risk is a blip in the radar smaller than any measurement error. It takes many generations for it to overcome that first, minor step.
Alright. The way you express yourself sounds as if you're a bit frustrated, but I do think that your position is reasonable.
