(July 8, 2014 at 9:51 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Hey guys, just had a conversation about something on which I'd like your input.
The majority of people that I know and hang out with would describe themselves as a 'skeptic' as a positive thing, and use it as a label as important to them as the label "Christian" might be to others. However, so many times I've noticed my friends and others who self-define as a skeptic being distinctly un-skeptical about a ton of issues. The most common gap in skepticism I see is in regards to Eastern or alternative medicine, like acupuncture or balance wristbands or homeopathy and shit like that, even things as simple as buying into an infomercial about a miracle pill* sets off my eyebrow-raise-meter. I wouldn't deign to label someone as a 'true skeptic' or anything silly like that, and I'm sure I could be more skeptical about a lot of things, but buying into blatantly obvious woo and snake oil like that really grinds on me when people describe themselves as being skeptical and secular.
Do you guys share this (possibly unjustified) irritation with anyone you know? Doesn't even have to be the whole alternative medicine bullshit, could be just about anything.
Additionally, do you think that skepticism, properly applied, leads necessarily to atheism?
Thanks!
It's simple, they're not true skeptics, they're beginner skeptics, just children who are skeptical of Santa but believe in a monster under their bed. I mean, I always tell people I'm skeptical of their bullshit ideas when they come up and they will say without fail "I'm skeptical too"... just not about these pet topics. And when given evidence, they show anything but skepticism, but instead show dogmatic stubbornness to some of these pseudo-science topics.
If the hypothetical idea of an afterlife means more to you than the objectively true reality we all share, then you deserve no respect.