(July 12, 2014 at 8:38 pm)Lek Wrote:(July 12, 2014 at 8:10 pm)Blackout Wrote: No, evidence that the scriptures are genuine, aka historical evidence.
The following article talks about an inscription on a stone tablet in which an Aramean king boasts of his military victory over the "king of Israel " and the "house of David".
http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily...bible-stor
I'm not going through the work of individually listing things, when this website already does:
http://www.equip.org/articles/biblical-a...the-bible/
Of course, historical evidence is not the only reason for accepting the factuality of the bible. The continuity of the message passed down through the centuries is another practical reason I have for believing the scriptures.
So you're going to prove your point by quoting websites? I don't see any merit here, I could as well quote a website claiming Jesus never existed.
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you
