RE: A quite disturbing absurdity in Christianity
July 13, 2014 at 7:47 am
(This post was last modified: July 13, 2014 at 8:01 am by Dystopia.)
(July 12, 2014 at 11:43 pm)Lek Wrote:(July 12, 2014 at 9:03 pm)Blackout Wrote: No, a two or three lines answer will be enough if you outline the basic arguments and evidence supporting them. The Christian gospels are not historically reliable.
If you don't want to visit the websites I referenced, then you're really not interested in seeking the truth. Where do you think I and most others go to find information? I'm not a biblical historian or archaeologist. I go to various sources, compare, and try to determine which are most reliable. If you want I can use your method. When you ask me for evidence to support the historical reliability of scripture, I'll just reply by asking you for evidence that it's not. Anyway, I've given you some evidence.
Jenny A already answered before I logged in again... I have nothing more to say. If you truly used the historical method, compared the most reliable sources, you'd reach the conclusion a huge part of the bible is forged. No offense.
And before using the argument of passing the burden of evidence to the other part, something you can't do because you're making a positive claim, I'll ask you, why isn't the lord of the rings accurate evidence for god?
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you
