(July 12, 2014 at 8:38 pm)Lek Wrote:(July 12, 2014 at 8:10 pm)Blackout Wrote: No, evidence that the scriptures are genuine, aka historical evidence.
The following article talks about an inscription on a stone tablet in which an Aramean king boasts of his military victory over the "king of Israel " and the "house of David".
http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily...bible-stor
Tel Dan is suspected of forgery. The oldest accepted archaeological artifact directly confirming any aspect of the biblical text is the Mesha Stele Link which mentions king Omri, beyond that the archaelogical record directly contradicts the biblical text.
Quote:I don't understand why you'd come to a discussion forum, and then proceed to reap from visibility any voice that disagrees with you. If you're going to do that, why not just sit in front of a mirror and pat yourself on the back continuously?-Esquilax
Evolution - Adapt or be eaten.
