RE: If beauty doesn't require God, why should morality? (Bite me Dr. Craig.)
July 24, 2014 at 12:44 pm
(July 24, 2014 at 12:29 pm)whateverist Wrote: The idea expressed by Christian apologists that morality only makes sense if you can ground it in an objective source ...
God is not an objective source, by definition.
"Objective", by definition, means independent of any being's opinions or judgments. This remains the definition no matter how powerful, wise or benevolent the said being might be.
That's just the tip of the iceberg of problems with this line of thinking.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
