(July 28, 2014 at 8:53 am)Harris Wrote:(July 28, 2014 at 12:19 am)Mr.wizard Wrote: We get the concept of god not existing from the claim you make that god exists. Its a default position to the claim, you claim god exists, we say we don't believe your claim. Why is this so hard to understand?
No, I am not only saying God exist. I am giving logical evidence from science and nature. You are concentrating only on the mechanism but not the agency, which has produced this mechanism, and running it. Perhaps, because you cannot perceive that agency with your direct senses. It is just as if you are saying electronic circuitry inside Sony TV is more important than Akio Morita. Well it is explaining how the circuitry works but it is not if I ask you the question, how that circuitry does comes into existence in first place. At this stage, everybody got speechless.
Is that because you'd shot them?
In all seriousness, though, saying that you've given "logical evidence from science and nature" is rather hilarious don't you think?
To all the lurkers out there, if you can go back through this dude's thread(s) and posts and see where he's used even a glimmer of "logical evidence from science and nature", please join and let us know so we can go and read it. Because I can't remember seeing any.
Love atheistforums.org? Consider becoming a patreon and helping towards our server costs.