If beauty doesn't require God, why should morality? (Bite me Dr. Craig.)

[bennyboy]

Well, and again, by reference to the equipment, of course your experience -would- be subjective. It isn't someone else's eyes or ears you experience things with, and it isn't someone else's brain that processes that information. So I suppose the only other requirement for subjective experience to exist is for the universe to be one that -can be- experienced. That sets the bar pretty low, doesn't it?

I'm not talking about whether experience is or isn't subjective. Of course it is. I'm talking about why there IS a subjective anything rather than a lack of it. What about this universe, which is supposed to be a deterministic interplay of four fundemental forces and energy in different states over time, requires/allows anything like a subjective perspective?

"red," rather than just processing it

"red" -is- "processing it". That's why you and I probably don't have the same color in mind when we say "red" - even though we're talking about the same spot on the spectrum.

So what color are x-rays? To a computer which has a physical apparatus which can measure them, they presumably are not a color at all. Just input, processing, output.