RE: Why I Don't Believe in Atheism
August 1, 2014 at 10:06 am
(This post was last modified: August 1, 2014 at 10:08 am by Thumpalumpacus.)
(July 31, 2014 at 5:39 pm)MPCADF Wrote: The burden of the proof remains on the atheist because I've done my part with the proof for the 'uncreated Creator' which remains unchallenged.
![[Image: 2m2f03a.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=oi45.tinypic.com%2F2m2f03a.jpg)
(July 31, 2014 at 5:39 pm)MPCADF Wrote: We observe trillions of cause and effects in nature, and no hard evidence of something from nothing (that is, non-existence), so nature can't start up from nothing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_fluctuation
(July 31, 2014 at 5:39 pm)MPCADF Wrote: And nature cannot always have existed because if it did, you would have had an eternity to come into being before now, so you should have already happened.
... and what makes you think that this is not the exact point in eternity wherein we come to exist? Because by your logic, that point had to arrive sometime. Now is as good a time as any.
(July 31, 2014 at 5:39 pm)MPCADF Wrote: Therefore, nature needs a cause outside of itself, outside of time and space, being uncreated.
Oooh, you used "therefore" again ... this must be logical.
(July 31, 2014 at 5:39 pm)MPCADF Wrote: This uncreated Creator is what we are talking about when way say 'God'.
No, that is what Christians mean. The Christian god is certainly logically impossible, by the way.
(July 31, 2014 at 5:39 pm)MPCADF Wrote: Now that you know God exists find out which religion is the correct one, since only one religion can be true since God does not contradict Himself.
There is no true religion. They all founder on the selection bias of their adherents; you exemplify the phenomenon in this very thread.
Oh, and rehashing arguments without taking into account objections is intellectually dishonest, and therefore (there's that word again!) I will resume mocking your posts and no longer try to engage you thoughtfully any more. Pearls, swine, etc etc.