RE: Why I Don't Believe in Atheism
August 1, 2014 at 2:05 pm
(This post was last modified: August 1, 2014 at 2:05 pm by Welsh cake.)
(July 31, 2014 at 5:39 pm)MPCADF Wrote: The burden of the proof remains on the atheist because I've done my part with the proof for the 'uncreated Creator' which remains unchallenged.That's not the way an epistemological dispute works.
The burden of proof remains on the party who makes the claim. You sir, claim there's a god.
Now you must prove it.
Build your case. Provide a clear positive ontology for the being you identify as 'god'.
Quote:We observe trillions of cause and effects in nature, and no hard evidence of something from nothing (that is, non-existence), so nature can't start up from nothing.No one is claiming here that reality came from nothing. No one except you, that is.
Prove it.
Quote:Therefore, nature needs a cause outside of itself, outside of time and space, being uncreated.SPECIAL PLEADING.
Quote:since only one religion can be true since God does not contradict Himself.Another huge claim.
Prove it then. Which man-cult is the true one?
