RE: Shouldn't the Department of Homeland Security
August 4, 2014 at 9:16 pm
(This post was last modified: August 4, 2014 at 9:17 pm by Drich.)
(August 2, 2014 at 3:08 pm)Polaris Wrote:(August 2, 2014 at 2:41 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Apparently it entails being a hit man for rich corporate pricks.
What else have you got?
It entails enforcing the law against criminal enterprises typically those who have a negative impact upon the economy (in this case, it was an issue about intellectual property rights that had previously been covered by the United States Customs Service) or those with products that come from state actors the government does not allow trade.
Oooo burn Minnie.
(August 4, 2014 at 8:12 pm)Polaris Wrote:(August 3, 2014 at 6:11 pm)Minimalist Wrote: They do not have to convert a civil issue into a criminal one for the benefit of fat cat corporate scumbags who want to use the law to settle their petty squabbles.
Time to put on your tin-foil hat again.
