Atheism/Theism and Pseudoscience

[FatAndFaithless]

Just a little observation that I noted followed by a question.

I recently moved to Texas from the Chicago area for a job, and it's been a bit of a culture shock. I walk 2 miles home from work each day and I pass four churches and can see two more on other streets. I expected that much, but I also pass two "Psychics", an acupuncture "clinic", an anti-aging herablist, and a storefront that claims to offer astrological guidance. It struck me to see such an eclectic bundle of new-agey superstition sprinkled between traditional religious superstition, and it got me thinking about something.

Of the people that I know well enough to understand their religious beliefs, the people that have the healing crystals and horoscopes and balance wristbands are actually atheists, while the more religious people I know stick more closely to their own religious crap, but don't subscribe to ghosts or psychics or homeopathy. I was wondering if you guys have noticed a correlation either way between atheism or theism and pseudoscience? Are theists more likely to believe in pseudoscience because of their religious beliefs, or are they kind of isolated in their own irrational bubble against it? Could also be no correlation at all, seeing as my sample size is pretty limited to my experience, but it would be interesting to explore.

My guess is that your personal social experiences are not representative of the entire atheist population. I do not have any data to prove my claim, but I believe atheists will be less likely to believe in pseudo-science. Of course atheists can believe in spirits, afterlives, ghosts, astrology, it's just too damn incoherent, most atheists will trust the scientific method and dismiss supernatural claims. It's just like atheists against gay marriage, they are rare but they exist.

I don't know if there is a correlation between theism and pseudo science, but I would bet so. I would also bet atheists are less likely to trust pseudo-science, as you can see here on AF. The people I see following pseudo-science claims, mainly astrology and zodiac signs, hold all kind of beliefs, but I think most of them take it as a joke and don't blindly believe everything horoscopes say. I'd also imagine non religious spiritual people following pseudo science more closely, maybe because religious theists are busy reading their holy book (and some pseudo-science such as witchcraft and guessing the future could be considered sinful) while non religious theists need something supernatural to prove their beliefs, therefore an horoscope could be a great way to prove the something higher exists because these people forcibly associate events that make them believe the horoscope is predicting the future. Let's say the horoscopes says 'Today something bad will happen' - This can account for anything. 'I feel off the chair, damn the horoscope is telling the truth!'.

A funny person I met in college - Female liberal, a bit on the feminazi side. She and a guy were talking (she is an atheist, and a very strong one), and he was like 'Will you date me?', and she replied 'Sorry, I don't date gemini people, that never works for me'. Because fuck logic that's why

Yeah the sample size I have is admittedly tiny. however, I wouldn't exactly say the population here on AF is really representative either. I wish there was some big study on this, and there might be but I can't go looking for it at work :/