RE: Should body armor be regulated?
August 30, 2014 at 11:41 am
(This post was last modified: August 30, 2014 at 11:44 am by Endo.)
(August 30, 2014 at 11:38 am)Diablo Wrote:(August 30, 2014 at 11:33 am)Endo Wrote: What, where?
'Loaded post'
Oh, that. Hehe. I'm kinda slow today.
(August 30, 2014 at 11:09 am)Chad32 Wrote: I'm more concerned about firearm regulation than body armor. If type three protects against hunting rifles, then it's probably just bought to protect against idiots who drink while handling their firearms, so they don't have to resort to using orange clothes. If you can't tell the difference between a human in camo, and a deer, then you don't need to be out in the woods with a gun.
But more often, it's purchased and worn by "right-wing ultra-conservative gun nuts" who are usually ex-military and are involved in local militia groups, the Tea Party, and other sorts of debauchery. Knowing that, how do you feel?
