(August 30, 2014 at 1:25 pm)Insanity Wrote:(August 30, 2014 at 1:20 pm)Losty Wrote:is there any legitimate argument for this? I mean, not necessarily one you agree with, but one that at least tries to make sense?
Probably because they think its the Hollywood indestructible body armor that you can be shot 50 times and carry on running around and diving through the air firing two pistols at the same time.
Even if it was I still wouldn't understand the logic. They won't regulate guns, but they want to regulate things that protect us from guns? I can't wrap my mind around it.
