RE: Science: A Religion? (long post)
September 7, 2014 at 12:21 pm
(This post was last modified: September 7, 2014 at 12:21 pm by Anomalocaris.)
To believe what is verifiably true to be verifiably true, is not religion.
Nor is the belief that proceeding from an accumulation of verifiable truths gives higher likelihood of generating sound solutions to problems than proceeding from a central unsupported assertion backed by no demonstrably effective means of truth finding.
So no, science is not religion and the opposite of religion.
Nor is the belief that proceeding from an accumulation of verifiable truths gives higher likelihood of generating sound solutions to problems than proceeding from a central unsupported assertion backed by no demonstrably effective means of truth finding.
So no, science is not religion and the opposite of religion.
